05/06/2008

Us And Them

John Derbyshire on Rev. Jeremiah Wright:

What has been the secret of his success? How did he do all that? By appealing to racial solidarity and pride, that's how. All that stuff that grates on our ears — the "black value system," loyalty to "the African motherland," "white folk's greed drives a world in need," and the rest — was an essential component of the Wright success package. Wright succeeded by tapping in to one of the deepest wells of human emotion and motivation: group solidarity, loyalty to the tribe, the gens.

Anyone want to tell me that Wright would have been just as sensationally successful if he had eschewed all the hate-whitey stuff and preached a message of universalism, color-blindness, and racial reconciliation?

One of the must-read essays of recent months has been Jerry Muller's "Us and Them" in Foreign Affairs. Here's the summary:

Americans generally belittle the role of ethnic nationalism in politics. But in fact, it corresponds to some enduring propensities of the human spirit, it is galvanized by modernization, and in one form or another, it will drive global politics for generations to come. Once ethnic nationalism has captured the imagination of groups in a multiethnic society, ethnic disaggregation or partition is often the least bad answer.

If you think the U.S.A. is somehow magically immune from this trend, you're dreaming.

05/05/2008

Florida Governor Charlie Crist

Larry Thornberry on McCain and Florida:

The new poll is disturbing to Florida Republicans, but doubtless encouraging to Democrats and to Republican (sort of) Florida Governor Charlie Crist, who wants to be on the ticket with McCain about as much as any young boy ever wanted a new bicycle for Christmas. Perhaps encouraging as well to Clinton partisans who argue she is more electable than the increasingly flawed South Side saint.

Crist is popular with Floridians, though less so than a year ago, and with the Florida mainstream media. It's not hard to understand why Crist is one of the few Republicans the media like. He's taken consistently "moderate" (translation from the mediaspeak: liberal) positions on social and environmental issues. For example, he's as daft as any Democrat on global warming, wanting a very restrictive cap and trade system for carbon-based fuels that would warm the heart of any former Soviet commissar.

The conventional wisdom is that Crist would help McCain carry Florida, without which state McCain has little chance of winning in November. But Crist's political pull elsewhere would be limited, because he's at least as unappealing to the conservative Republican base McCain needs to win over as McCain himself is, and has far less gravitas. He's sort of a Dan Quayle without the maturity and seriousness. For long-time observers of Crist and Florida politics, imagining Charlie Crist in the Oval Office is a little like imagining an armadillo in a tuxedo. You guess it could be done, but what would be the point?

(via The Club For Growth)

05/03/2008

Senator Howard Metzenbaum: Why Are Liberal Democrats Always Such Hypocrites, Even In Death?

From the Online WSJ:

But we come today not to judge the late Senator, only to praise him for one last act of personal financial acumen. Though a lifelong Ohioan, the Senator moved to Florida in 2002, according to a declaration of domicile filed with the Broward County Clerk's office in 2003. In doing so, he avoided paying his home state's income tax (top rate: 6.55%).

More important as he neared the end of his life, the former Senator also saved his family from paying Ohio's death tax, which features one of the highest state rates (7%) and lowest asset thresholds – $338,333 – in the country. Florida famously has no income or estate tax, which is one reason other than the climate that it is home to so many northern-born retirees.

Howard Metzenbaum thus denied the state in which he lived most of his life a parting financial gift. But he has at least provided the rest of us with a teaching moment in tax policy. If a liberal lion like Metzenbaum is willing to relocate late in life to avoid his state's death tax, maybe living politicians in Ohio will better understand how their confiscatory tax laws are driving its citizens to warmer climes.

04/28/2008

And That's Entertainment!

An excerpt from Dr. Melissa Clouthier:

John McCain's overarching principle is John McCain. As far as I can tell, he's the only one he's interested in serving. And that makes him different from other politicians, how? What is unique about John McCain is that he doesn't go to the trouble of even attempting to pander to his constituents. He's balls off about making it clear that he will do things his own damn way. North Carolina can suck his butt. Conservatives can bite his hiney. He just doesn't care.

On this delightful backdrop, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama duke it out for their party's nomination. Democrats kvetch that Republicans are too smug. Or "smiling too much", whatever. At this point, Republicans are looking for something, anything, that is remotely encouraging about this election. We're settling for entertainment.

04/23/2008

The Friends of Barack Obama

An excerpt from Power Line:

When Illinois State Senator Alice Palmer decided to retire in 1995, she hand-picked local left-winger Barack Obama as her successor. In order to introduce Obama to influential liberals in the district, she held a function at the home of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. This was, really, the beginning of Obama's political career, and it linked him forever with Ayers and Dohrn, with whom, as his campaign has acknowledged, he continues to have a friendly relationship.

Ayers and Dohrn were famous radicals, and fugitives from the law, in the late 1960s and early 1970s. Dohrn, actually, was the more famous of the two; she was the head, as I recall, of Students for a Democratic Society or one of its factions. Dohrn was crazy. She is the only public figure, to my knowledge, to approve publicly and enthusiastically of the Charles Manson murders.

Ayers was a would-be murderer of soldiers and policemen, but he wasn't a very good terrorist. He had the ill fortune to choose September 11, 2001, as the day on which to publish an op-ed in the New York Times, in which he said that he didn't regret his attempted murders and only wished that he had planted more bombs.

04/22/2008

Gosh, Where To Start?

PJ O'Rourke on the USS Theodore Roosevelt:

Landing on an aircraft carrier was the most fun I'd ever had with my trousers on. And the 24 hours that I spent aboard the USS Theodore Roosevelt--the "Big Stick"--were an equally unalloyed pleasure. I love big, moving machinery. And machinery doesn't get any bigger, or more moving, than a U.S.-flagged nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that's longer than the Empire State Building is tall and possesses four acres of flight deck. This four acres, if it were a nation, would have the fifth or sixth largest airforce in the world--86 fixed wing aircraft plus helicopters.

The Theodore Roosevelt and its accompanying cruisers, destroyers, and submarines can blow up most of the military of most of the countries on earth. God has given America a special mission. Russia can barely blow up Chechnya. China can blow up Tibet, maybe, and possibly Taiwan. And the EU can't blow up Liechtenstein. But the USA can blow up .??.??. gosh, where to start?

04/14/2008

A Strange Combination

Excerpts from Hugh Hewitt:

Obama doesn't understand a great deal of America.  He has no experience with it other than as a politician looking for votes, and even that experience outside of Chicago has been accumulated only since he began his run for the U.S. Senate in 2003.  His life has made him keenly aware of urban dysfunction and of African-American issues even as it has exposed him to the Third World in a way that very few American officials have been.

But he is blind to what makes most American communities work.  His family experiences and his work experiences have never immersed him in the majority of America that not only functions but indeed thrives.  His projection on to that America of his own beliefs -- that odd mix of the beliefs assembled during his very unusual childhood, in Hawaii's most privileged school, on Chicago's south side, and at Columbia and Harvard Law School and Trinity's congregation-- has opened a lot of eyes to just how different Obama's vision of America is. ...

What Obama knows is the world in which he has lived, which is a strange combination of some of the toughest neighborhoods in the U.S. and its most elite institutions.  He belonged to a church that indulged radical politics in its weekly bulletin and from its pulpit even as it struggled to help some devastated neighborhoods.  He did so after attending and absorbing the attitudes of America's most elite law school and having been taught by its --mostly-- hard-left professors.  He does so from the lofty perch of the U.S. Senate.  He's had a schizophrenic life that combined the toughest aspects of America and its most indulgent.

03/23/2008

A Few Quotes Too Many

Via Clayton Cramer, a pithy excerpt from Alan K. Henderson:

Obama explains that he stays with his church because he knows about Wright a lot more than just a few selected quotes. But aren't those few quotes sufficient to identify serious moral flaws that call into question a man's qualifications as a spiritual leader. Wouldn't Fred Phelps' "God hates fags" sound bite be enough to tell me that investing 20 years at Westboro Baptist Church might not be a good idea?

Capitalism Is Just For The Little Guys

An excerpt from Don Salyards:

By opening its discount window to JPMorgan, the Federal Reserve System (the Fed) started a new precedent. Prior to last week, the Fed opened its discount window only to banks. For the first time in history, the discount window is now open to investment banking and brokerage firms. In essence, the Fed will now allow shaky and irresponsible investment bankers to exchange their bad loans for cash. The Fed might as well be accepting cereal box tops as collateral from some of these investment bankers! By monetizing the bad loans of investment bankers, the Fed will create either inflation or higher interest rates, the costs of which will be paid by taxpayers and consumers.

A huge moral hazard problem has been created. The large investment banking houses have been given tacit permission by the Fed to act irresponsibly anytime in the future, knowing they will always have the Fed to buy their cruddy loans. The mega banks are free to pay high salaries and extravagant bonuses during the good times, but are conveniently insulated from losses during the bad times. That’s not my understanding of Capitalism.

The Capitalism I am familiar with is the best economic system on the face of the earth. People and businesses are free to take risk, make investments, and even to invent new financial products, with the understanding that they will reap the profits or losses inherent in their activities. When you serve consumers well and provide them with a superior product or service at a reasonable price, you stand to make a profit. When you’re stupid and offer inferior products or services, you’re supposed to suffer losses, even to the extent that you lose your business and fortune.

If my businesses suffer losses, I don’t think that we will be able to get a loan at the Fed discount window. These days, I guess Capitalism is just for the little guys.

03/14/2008

The Latest And Most Perfect Oxymoron In The Tradition Of Jumbo Shrimp, Random Order, and Government Intelligence

"Patriotic Progressives"

02/27/2008

Now We All Get To Invest In The Real Estate Bubble

A post from one of the best bloggers ever, Philip Greenspun:

Even here on Eleuthera (Bahamas), there is plenty of news about various taxpayer-funded schemes for bailing out subprime borrowers and lenders.  All of them have one thing in common:  they will be paid for from general tax revenue.

Imagine you bought your house in the early 1990s.  You wanted to move in the early 2000s, but decided that a 100-year-old decrepit wooden shack wasn’t worth $1 million.  So you sat in your old house and put your money in productive investments, such as the common stocks of businesses.  You watched some of your neighbors go crazy with real estate greed, many of them making a lot of money, until some were left holding a 100-year-old decrepit wooden shack at $2 million and there were no more “greater fools.”  You didn’t make any money in the real estate bubble, but at least you didn’t have to put any funds in and you didn’t lose any money either.

Fast forward to 2008.  Governments at various levels have decided that they have to bail out people who spent more than the houses turned out to be worth and the financial companies who weren’t wise enough to notice that the U.S. is in fact not short of forests that can be cut down for more sprawl.  Where will the money come from?  You, me, and everyone else who did not participate in the bubble.

So… we missed buying real estate with a lot of leverage back in 2000 and missed the big ride up through 2004 or whenever.  Now we get to buy that same real estate at a much higher price and without any upside at all since we won’t actually own any of it.

02/19/2008

Hillary Hilarity: The Aunt Bee Pickle Story and The Zany Antics That Ensue When You Assume Your Customers Want Another Batch

Forget the political pundits, go to Mayberry for the timeless yet spot-on analysis:

It's canning time again, and Aunt Bee has put up another batch of pickles. After realizing the only thing they're good for is killing flies brave enough to land on them, Andy and Barney decide to substitute store-bought for her homemade and hand the originals to travelers passing through Mayberry. After the switch, Bee decides to enter her pickles in the county fair. Unfortunately, the perennial winner is Clara Johnson, Bee's best friend, and she has her heart set on winning her 12th blue ribbon in a row. Andy and Barney have no choice but to destroy all eight jars before she can enter, so they eat night and day until all the pickles are gone. They do their work proudly, but Bee decides that since the boys liked them so much, she will make a double batch.

There comes a point when you just can't keep smiling and eating anymore, and you hurl with the violent force of a million pickles. Moral: Beware The Double Batch.

Selling Hope

From Cal Thomas:

Placing hope in politicians absolves too many of us of our responsibilities. In 1994, when Republicans were on the verge of returning to power in the House for the first time in four decades, one of the books making the rounds was "The Tragedy of American Compassion" by Marvin Olasky. The book traced the history of compassionate behavior and found that most of it came from individuals and religious institutions. The religious institutions offered hope by dedicating themselves to changing the lives of people whose bad choices had put them in need of help. Changed lives produced changed behavior and, thus, changed circumstances, leading to a more hopeful future. Olasky wrote that tragedy occurred when government began to occupy the space once dominated by religious and personal charity, displacing hope and leading to despair.

The "hope" being sold by Obama and his true believers is misplaced. Obama cannot deliver; he cannot save; he cannot improve individual circumstances by redistributing wealth and talking to America's dictatorial enemies. He is selling snake oil.

02/14/2008

The Three Candidates And Who They Remind Me Of

  • John McCain: An older uncle or great-uncle who was OK most of the time, but who could get really grouchy and mean if he got too tired or if you got too loud, and since you never really knew what would set him off you just avoided him.
  • Hillary Clinton: A bitter old divorced woman who, 10 years later, is still complaining about her "ex". And that was from when she was still winning.
  • Barack Obama: When TV was just starting to show African-Americans in sitcoms and commercials back in the late 1960's, the sort of not-too-black black actors they would use.

02/13/2008

The Enthusiasm Gap, Part 1: Web Traffic For The Three Presidential Contenders

01/29/2008

Reversing The Tide Of Big Government

Christian Schneider explains how we do it:

So we have a situation where government is doing for people what people should be doing for themselves and the taxpayers footing the bill are barely noticing. We're inching toward full-fledged socialism without even realizing it.

There is only one solution to reverse the trend - we need to change the law to make it so we have to pay all of our taxes at once. And when I say "all taxes" I mean all taxes. Federal. State. Local. Income. Sales. Property. Alcohol. Smokes. No withholding. All at once.

You made $40,000 this year? You owe $15,000 in one shot. Pay up. Your family income is $100,000? Your check for $38,000 is due right now. You're a pack-a-day smoker too? Better tack on another $650. Your giant tax bill is due one week before the general election.

Imagine if that is how we did it. Heads would explode. The beauty of having to pay taxes this way is that it would sure get the conversation started about how much is enough when it comes to government spending.

01/27/2008

The Civil War In The Democratic Party

An excerpt from James T. Harris:

Civil war has broken out in the Democrat party and this time the war really is over race. Clinton, Inc. represents the old south -- Blacks are all right as long as they know their place, don’t get to uppity, follow, never lead, got it?  The lion share of AAD’s (Americans of African descent) that support all things Clinton, are the old guard of the civil rights generation, those born before 1960. i.e. Al Sharp ton, SC Johnson and almost all of the old AAD’s that are in congress.

Obama represents the north – the fighting 54th, fighting for the freedom of a generation enslaved by group think politics.  Obama represents the post civil rights generation, those of us who never experienced “the struggle” and are thereby beholding to the old guard of the antiquated movement. ...

This is a generational conflict and it is fueled by power, resentment, greed and good old racism. The old guard, who refuses to embrace the future for fear of losing the memory of their past, has entered into a Faustian deal with the Democratic machine, a deal that Obama threatens to destroy.

01/26/2008

If Our Suburban Residents Cannot Teach In Your City Schools, Then Your City Residents Cannot Teach In Our Suburban Schools

Big controversy in Milwaukee lately over this story:

Dan Bearss is enthusiastic about teaching science at Custer High School in Milwaukee. He really likes his kids, and - ask a bunch of them - they think highly of him. Science teachers are in short supply nationwide and good ones are highly valued, especially at challenging schools such as Custer. But Bearss' last day at the school will be Friday. Why? Because it turns out he lives in Brown Deer. ... Given the choice between moving into the city to comply with the residency rule for MPS employees that has been in effect since the late 1970s or leaving, Bearss decided to leave. He intends to find another teaching job, but it won't be in MPS. ...

Bearss, 51, said he is a graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis and served 10 years of active military duty. He then joined a military reserve unit and worked five years for the Defense Intelligence Agency. He was recalled for active duty in Bosnia in 1993. He left the service after that and got a job with a business. He was transferred to Milwaukee, but the company later scaled back, closing its Milwaukee office and laying him off. He decided then to become a teacher. ...

The residency rule has been controversial for years. Some say it is unfair and MPS needs good teachers too much to restrict the pool of possible teachers. Others say it doesn't actually have much effect on who teaches overall and it's good for the city to have employees live within the city line. Efforts in the state Legislature to repeal the residency rule recently have not succeeded.

My question is simply this: Why are we folks in the suburbs being such chumps? If Milwaukee won't let our residents teach in their schools, then why do we let Milwaukee residents teach in our schools? It's way past time to fire them all and replace them with teachers who don't live in such a discriminatory jurisdiction. Such a rule would be completely fair, and would put the destiny of these Milwaukee residents/suburban teachers in their own hands:

  1. The Milwaukee Public Schools could rescind their discriminatory residency requirement. or
  2. Failing that, those Milwaukee residents teaching in suburban school districts could move somewhere else, to a place that didn't have such a discriminatory residency requirement.

Truly an idea whose time has come. We've been chumps for far too long.

01/23/2008

The Trial, Written By Franz Kafka As Told To Hugo Chavez

An excerpt from Thor Halvorssen:

The case never went to trial but, like in so many cases in the Venezuelan judiciary under Chavez, the charges serve as a Damocles Sword over those accused, leaving them in legal limbo. Charges are never finalized, trials are never commenced. Instead, those affected are usually prevented from leaving the country and subjected to dozens of procedural meetings. This permits the government to keep the number of political prisoners to a minimum while having the effect of exhausting and ultimately emasculating political opponents. More than four hundred people have been charged for political crimes that have never gone to trial.

01/14/2008

Pat Cunningham: A Liberal You Should Add To Your Blogroll

Pat Cunningham is one of those guys that blogging was invented for. Here's his post on the subject of Unity:

The one thing about Barack Obama’s political rhetoric that gives me pause is his emphasis on “unity.”

In other quarters as well, there’s altogether too much talk this season about promoting political “unity” in America, about bringing an end to the bitter partisanship that supposedly hamstrings the political process and prevents the government from ably serving the people.

This notion has even given rise to a movement called Unity08 (Web site HERE), the leaders of which might naively try to field an independent presidential ticket comprised of candidates from both political parties.

And then there’s the recent idiotic statement by prospective presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg, the mayor of New York City, about how he wants “to get partisanship out of politics.” That’s like wanting to get the punching out of boxing.

Yet another manifestation of this search for nirvana in the middle of the political spectrum was evidenced this week at a CONFERENCE OF SO-CALLED MODERATES from both parties at the University of Oklahoma.

What’s going on here? Is there a virus going around that renders otherwise intelligent people ignorant of the realities of politics in a democratic republic?

Except in the general sense that we Americans all should honor the most fundamental principles of fair play and free speech, unity is neither desirable nor achievable in our society.

Promoters of unity often simply want to quash debate.  It’s in the name of admirable unity, for instance,  that Americans are told they should all support their government’s military misadventure in Iraq.  Such also was the case during the Vietnam War, when the mantra was that antiwar dissent was disloyal and un-American.

If nothing else, the unity push is reminiscent of a glaring misapprehension among our nation’s Founding Fathers, many of whom thought they had created a system that would thrive and prosper without the emergence of anything so ugly as political parties.

The irony, as historian Joseph J. Ellis notes in his latest book, “American Creation,” is that the greatest legacy of the Founding Fathers was the creation (even if unintentional) of the world’s first two-party system.

Washington, Jefferson, Adams, Madison and the others seemed to think that political factionalism would sully and weaken their wonderful republic.  Rather, it has strengthened it.

Unity is a dangerous notion.  The only way I would be tempted to embrace it is if the unity is all in support of the positions I hold on the issues of the day — and even then I eventually would recognize it as inimical to basic American principles.

01/07/2008

John B. Anderson Endorses Barack H. Obama

John B. Anderson was my Congressman, and gave the keynote address at my high school's mock political convention in 1972. (via Pat Cunningham)

12/17/2007

Starving Horses: A Case Study Of Liberalism In Action

This one's from Illinois. It occurs at the intersection of:

  1. The ethanol alternative-energy boondoggle
  2. Animal rights groups shutting down the only remaining horse-slaughtering plant in the USA.

The all-too-predictable results are described in this excerpt from the Rockford Register-Star:

Depending on the point of view, this fall’s shutdown of the nation’s last horse slaughtering plant will leave thousands of unwanted horses with no place to go, or will simply shift the animals to slaughterhouses in Canada and Mexico.

All Barbara Chmielewski knows is that demand for space at her horse rescue center is significantly higher this year. “It’s probably increased 20 fold. Everybody is calling us, wanting to dump their horses on us,” said Chmielewski, founder and executive director of the Lazy Maple Equine Rescue & Rehabilitation Center. ...

The DeKalb plant’s closing has been only one factor, and maybe not the biggest factor, in the overflow, Barbara Chmielewski said. A shortage of hay and the high price of horse feed also have contributed. “Hayfields have been plowed up to plant corn because of ethanol. I am getting calls on a daily basis from people saying their neighbor’s horse is getting thinner. People don’t have the money to buy hay,” she said.

11/20/2007

Cyclones In Bangladesh

From PJ O'Rourke's All the Trouble in the World: The Lighter Side of Overpopulation, Famine, Ecological Disaster, Ethnic Hatred, Plague, and Poverty:

Bangladesh is not a wild success of a nation, but it's not a "basket case" or a helpless sponge for endless aid sops. A cyclone struck Bangladesh in November 1970 and killed approximately 225,00 people. ... Another tremendous cyclone hit in the fall of 1988 and this time "only" 2,200 people died. Evacuations had been planned, cyclone shelters had been built, weather predisctions -- and means of telling people what those predictions were -- had been improved. One and a half million tons of food had been stockpiled along with adequate medical supplies; 3,000 civilian and military medical teams were on call.

Of course in 1991 along came one more cyclone and killed 140,000 people. So it's strictly one day at a time in the big Bangladesh twelve-step recovery program.

11/15/2007

300-lb. Wheels That Come Flying Off Of Trucks At 60 MPH And Kill People: Are Conservatives Really To Blame?

Paul Soglin thinks so:

Flying Wheel: Milwaukee Highway Death and the Role of Government

... Somewhere there was failure. Somewhere there was some government agency too busy, too over-worked, stretched beyond its resources that was not able to effectively follow up and enforce the regulations. You know, those troublesome regulations that  drive up the cost of doing business.

Right now all levels of government are under assault. With "Americans for Prosperity," Wisconsin legislators and the political right clamoring to embrace Grover Norquist's goal to "..cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub," such incidents are not surprising.

That is not to say that government spending will eliminate all accidental deaths or that there is no limit for such spending. But statistically, the less resources there are for making highways safer, logically, there will be more deaths.

He goes on, but you get the idea. We conservatives/Republicans are pretty used to this by now. Let a major hurricane hit a city built below sea level and it's George W. Bush's fault. If a jet plane full of lesbian nuns crashes it will be due to the Iraq War. A fire in an orphanage? There will be a direct line of causation to Talk Radio.

But what do experts in the trucking industry have to say? From jsonline.com:

"In the last 10 to 15 years, more and more, they've been using liquid corrosives to melt salt on the roads instead of the solid rock salt and other compounds," Boyce said. "These liquid ice melters stick to the undercarriage and the axles and the wheels of a truck much more readily than solid de-icers.

"Because of that, when they were first started being used, maintenance managers were shocked to see that trailers were wearing out and bolts were falling off after just a few years on the road."

He said materials have been improved as a result. "But it's still a problem," he said.

And from Land Line, The Business Magazine For Professional Truckers:

The crisis of corrosion: Today’s newer ice-melting chemicals taking premature toll on equipment

Investigation led to one conclusion: Rust jacking and increased corrosion are directly traceable to the increased use of more aggressive snow- and ice-fighting chemicals.

Rock salt (sodium chloride) has been used to lower the freeze point of ice since the 1950s, and is often mixed with sand or cinders to increase traction. Passenger car and light-duty vehicle rusting increased in the 1970s. The auto industry responded with more non-corroding materials and improved coatings. Cars today are far less susceptible to rust, at least from salt. But resistance to salt alone is no longer enough.

In the late 1990s, highway departments found they could reduce costs by taking advantage of more aggressive snow-fighting chemicals. When they used rock salt, they had to position the snow plow-salt spreader combinations at regular intervals to wait for heavy snowfall or freezing rain. The trucks idled, wasting fuel and creating pollution. Drivers were paid to sit and wait, and then paid overtime when they were finally dispatched.

By adding magnesium chloride, calcium chloride and various acetates, highway departments could change operations. Mixtures were spread in anticipation of snowfall, to remain in place until snow actually fell. The mixtures would then melt the snow.

This usually gave the departments time to call up personnel and dispatch trucks, saving idling and overtime. Granular salts might be blown away, but spraying liquid compounds on the roads would leave the chemical coating to do its work later. Many departments started applying the mixtures, or brines, to the roads. The savings met and exceeded expectations – but the consequences were horrendous.

And from Heavy Duty Trucking:

Corrosion Versus Wheels

Corrosion - called rust when you're talking about iron and steel - is a natural force that eats away at metals. Left unchecked, it burrows deep into wheels. Corrosion is aided and abetted by road departments that use aggressive salts to melt ice and snow on pavements. Rock salt works well on pavement and can be fairly easily washed from vehicles to protect them. But the far more efficient magnesium- and calcium-chloride compounds are more corrosive and cling tenaciously to metal. Wheels are literally closer to salt sprays than anything else on the truck, so they need extra defensive measures to protect them.

And from truck magazine CCJ:

Confronting Corrosion

The root cause? While good old salt always has done a good job melting ice and snow — and, unfortunately, corroding metal — highway departments in snow-prone states have discovered that other compounds such as calcium chloride and magnesium chloride do a better melting job, and are far cheaper. They also are far more corrosive, often to critical vehicle safety components like brakes. ...

“It’s been tough getting people to realize the damage this stuff can do,” says Gambrell. “Even to tires. Think about it — if there’s a small nick in the tread, these chemicals can wick their way up to the steel belts and corrode them.” And it’s not just steel or other ferrous alloys that get attacked. “I’ve seen holes eaten in aluminum fuel tanks,” he attests. “No part on a truck is safe.”

Nor does it appear that the problem is getting better. Due to the low cost of the chemicals and their effectiveness at clearing roads, “it’s getting worse,” Gambrell says. “The highway departments figure that, if a little is good, more must be better.” ...

No doubt, trailer manufacturers are taking more precautions against corrosion, but the war is far from over. “Corrosion is still getting worse,” Stuart says. “We’re seeing better coatings and, just driving on the highway, you can see a lot more stainless and galvanized steel. But the use of these new chemicals is spreading faster than the industry can keep up.”

So I guess we conservatives aren't quite to blame for this one. But just wait a day and I'm sure we'll be on the hook for something else. Right, Paul?

Why Didn't Saddam Hussein Come Clean And Just Admit He Had No WMDs?

An excerpt from a fascinating article by Mark Goldblatt:

Ever since American forces invaded, overran and occupied Iraq in 2003, and discovered no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction, the great lingering question about the war has been why Saddam Hussein would spend an entire decade acting as though he possessed WMDs when he didn’t. Since the ceasefire agreement he’d signed in 1991, in order to remain in power after the first Gulf War, obligated him to get rid of them, why would Saddam intentionally endure crippling United Nations sanctions as he jerked around, and finally ejected, weapons inspectors? Why wouldn’t he just come clean if he had nothing to hide?

The answer, according Ronald Kessler in his new book, The Terrorist Watch: Inside the Desperate Race to Stop the Next Attack, is that Saddam ultimately feared United Nations actions less than he feared an attack from Iran . . . which, he calculated, would be much more likely if the leaders of Iran knew he had no WMDs. Kessler based his conclusions on information obtained by an Arabic-speaking FBI agent named George Piro who debriefed and befriended Saddam after the dictator’s capture in Iraq, during his months of captivity before his eventual execution.

In retrospect, Saddam’s calculus looks altogether logical. He’d fought a brutal stalemated war against Iran in the 1980s and viciously persecuted Iraq’s Shiite majority out of fear they might align themselves with their Shiite neighbor. More alarming still, from Saddam’s standpoint, was the fact that his own military had been decimated by the 1991 conflict with the American led coalition. If Iran did attack, he had no chance in a conventional war.

11/14/2007

Ilkka Kokkarinen Describes What It Feels Like To Be A Conservative

From his highly-enjoyable blog The Fourth Checkraise:

Don't do that, then

If I had to describe using only a couple of sentences what it feels like to be a conservative, I would probably compare it to the hypothetical but surreal experience of noticing that many people around you have sore heads because they keep banging them against a wall. If you don't do anything, that makes you a "part of the problem", especially if you express distaste against having to pay for some increasingly messy bureaucracy that claims to help headache sufferers even though it only ever comes up with increasingly absurd "solutions" to the new problems that its actions conjure up while its proponents pile up epicycles upon epicycles to explain away these failures. On the other hand, if you try to help by suggesting that their heads would stop hurting if they just stopped banging them against a wall, you are a "simpleton" who doesn't understand the complexity and the "root causes" of this problem. So what can you do then? Other than perhaps escape to some remaining island of sanity and hope that the madness doesn't follow you there, at least for a while.

If my parents had been Finnish my name would have been something like Tomma Mikmannonnen. I think Finnish names are so cool . . .

11/12/2007

Politics Have Become Personal

An excerpt from Nancy Morgan:

Politics have become personal. To challenge the worldview of a conservative, a gay person, a feminist or any other "group" is considered a direct attack on not only the validity of the particular view, but an attack on the person holding them. Invalidate their views and you invalidate them. You invalidate their struggle, their sacrifices, their self esteem. You invalidate them. No wonder dissent isn't welcome.

The core tenets of feminism have changed dramatically from the good old days when Gloria Steinam led the charge for equal rights for women. The days when the National Organisation of Women actually represented the goals of the average woman. Feminism has evolved. So has my mother. The chasm between mother and daughter has widened. When she looks at me, she sees a conservative and wonders where she failed. When I look at her, I see her confusion and take it personally.

Having a feminist mother has forced me to make a genuine effort to try to understand a mindset totally at odds with my own. I now try understand the underpinnings of other views, the anti-American, Bush lied, 9-11 was an inside job type of view. Instead of writing these guys off as nut-cases, as my mother does me, I've found that it's more productive to try to understand how one came to adopt what I consider such a radical mindset. Some times I am successful. Most times I am not. But I try.

My situation is not unlike that of many Americans these days. The war in Iraq, the increasing divide between red and blue states and the ongoing culture war is affecting many of us on a very personal level. Social interactions are increasingly defined by one's views instead of one's character. This is affecting families, marriages, business relationships and society as a whole. And not for the better.

10/20/2007

Is George W. Bush Jesus?

Philip Greenspun explains:

Everyone I met in Turkey hates American foreign policy.  Nobody I met in Turkey hates Americans.  How is this possible?  It seems that George W. Bush is the Jesus Christ for our [American] times, taking all of our sins upon his shoulders.  The Turks with whom I spoke blamed George W. personally for all of the harm done by the 300 million people here in the U.S.  As far as I can tell, George W. never does anything except ride as a passenger from speaking venue to speaking venue.  Therefore, the things of which the Turks are complaining must have been done by at least some of the rest of us, yet W. personally gets 100% of the blame.

George W. does not simply follow Jesus.  He is Jesus.

10/16/2007

Why The American Flag Lapel Pin Is Important

Excerpts from Eugene Volokh:

Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said he doesn't tell his wife he loves her any more, because "I love you" has become a substitute for "true love." The Illinois senator said he hopes to show his love by explaining his ideas about their relationship to her. Guess what the wife would think about that.

Of course, the story (from the AP) is a little different. ... But the essence is similar: Wearing a flag pin is not supposed to be an explanation or an argument, just as "I love you" is not supposed to be an explanation or an argument. It's supposed to be a traditional statement of affection, powerful because it's cliché. ...

The American people want a president who loves their country and who expresses that love, at an emotional as well as an intellectual level. For better or worse, a President Spock won't get elected. Candidate Obama should know that.

10/03/2007

Where Have All the Peaceniks Gone?

An excerpt from James Lewis:

Three days ago we saw the first pictures of Burmese villages being destroyed. We have learned  about the massacres of monks and other civilians peacefully protesting in Myanmar. British PM Gordon Brown said that "the death toll in the Myanmar crackdown to be ‘far greater' than has so far been reported."

That's at least three whole 24-hour news cycles, plenty of time to start a storm of protest. Where is the BBC? The Guardian? Der Spiegel? Der New York Times? Where are all the peaceniks of the Left?  Mother Sheehan, where art thou?

As far as I can tell, Burma's fascist massacres of peaceful Buddhist monks has not yet led to a peep from our self-proclaimed peaceniks. Where are they?

09/30/2007

Taking A Spineless Dive

An excerpt from Jonah Goldberg:

This whole line of argumentation is a sign of intellectual weakness or cowardice. Take, for example, that mossy cliché "I may disagree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it!"

The only reasonable response is, "Who gives a rat's patoot?" If I deny the reality of the Holocaust, or insist that "2 plus 2 equals a duck," or that I can make 10-minute brownies in six minutes, responding that you may disagree with what I say but will defend my right to say it is a shabby way to sound courageous while actually taking a spineless dive. How brave of you to defend me from a threat that doesn't exist while lamely avoiding actually challenging my statements.

Similarly, there's been a lot of high-minded gasbaggery over this elusive idea of "academic freedom." A more selectively invoked standard is hard to come by. Somehow, when former Harvard President Larry Summers, one of America's most esteemed economists, told a group of academics that the distribution of high-level cognitive abilities may not be evenly spread out among men and women, activist feminist professors got the vapors and claimed, from the comfort of their fainting couches, that their hysteria could only be cured by Summers' head on a platter. But Ward Churchill, a penny-ante buffoon who seems to have downloaded his Ph.D. from cheapdegrees.com, compares the victims of 9/11 to Holocaust planner Adolf Eichmann, and suddenly academic freedom demands Churchill keep his tenured job forever, at taxpayers' expense.

09/27/2007

The Race Gotcha Game

From the Lefty Bloggers favorite femme d'Hinckley, Jessica McBride:

1. Take a frank comment on race from a conservative commentator that, contextually, would offend few. Use it to reinforce the biased assumed truth held by many liberals and the MSM that conservatives are inherently racist.

2. Ignore the fact that no one who listened to the full debate complained at the time because they heard the context, which provided exoneration.

3. Have dishonest liberal blogs or websites with political motivation strip away all context and cherrypick a line or two to make the conservative's comment sound like something it wasn't - even when the conservative was clearly saying the opposite when all context is considered.

4. Rely on the MSM to push the story by reporting that controversy has now erupted. Just as conservative blogs often frame the news for talk radio hosts, so do liberal blogs often manage to push their agenda into sympathetic MSM forums. Count on the MSM to also report the comment without any context and in a fashion that makes the conservative sound idiotic and even racist. If you're really lucky, the MSM reporter/columnist will be biased enough to scream at the conservative or not even bother to call them for comment at all.

5. State pointblank that the conservative has now committed a gaffe and is under fire for comments that said X, Y, or Z. Again: No context allowed.

Presto.

That's how it works. The race gotcha game.

09/11/2007

Mondrian Farm Subsidy Maps

This one shows all the city slickers in the Twin Cities who are receiving big farm subsidies.

08/23/2007

Who Would Have Ever Thought That Bike Paths And Light Rail Would Prove So Deadly?

An excerpt from the Opinion Journal:

Some things in politics seem to be inevitable--and one of them is that any road or bridge tragedy will be followed by an argument to raise the gasoline tax. That's what is now happening in the wake of the terrible Minnesota bridge collapse, but that state's transportation and tax record shows precisely why voters are skeptical.

The gas tax pleas are coming from the usual suspects, in both Washington and St. Paul. James Oberstar, the Minnesota Democrat who runs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, recently stood beside the wreckage and recommended an increase in the 18.4-cent-a-gallon federal gas tax, as a way to prevent future bridge collapses. His wing man, Alaska Republican and former Transportation Chairman Don Young, agrees wholeheartedly.

As it happens, these are the same men who played the lead role in the $286 billion 2005 federal highway bill. That's the bill that diverted billions of dollars of gas tax money away from urgent road and bridge projects toward Member earmarks for bike paths, nature trails and inefficient urban transit systems.

08/13/2007

Nine Keys To Happiness In Marriage

From Dr. Laura:

According to a recent survey by the Pew Research Center, having children has fallen to eighth on a list of nine keys to happiness in marriage, way behind what is now considered more important, such as sharing household chores and being faithful:

1. Fidelity
2. Good sex
3. Sharing household chores
4. Adequate income
5. Good housing
6. Shared religious beliefs
7. Shared tastes and interests
8. Children
9. Agreement on politics
93%
70%
62%
53%
51%
49%
46%
41%
12%

... Of the nine qualities these folks mention as important for a successful marriage, only one had anything to do with giving, and that is children. The rest have to do with getting.  Thoughts of division of labor and responsibilities are clearly out the window as the issue of which person might be doing more in the house than the other is more important.   That sounds more like roommates than loving spouses.

When 50% more folks think that not taking one more bag of garbage to the curb than their spouse is more important to a marriage than combining love and energies into making a family, America is in trouble.

08/08/2007

What Is The Political Incentive For Bridge Repair And Maintenance?

An excerpt from Thomas Sowell:

Some people claim that the problem is how much money it would take to properly maintain bridges, highways, dams and other infrastructure. But money is found for other things, including things far less urgent and some things that are even counterproductive.

The real problem is that the political incentives are to spend the taxpayers' money on things that will enhance politicians' chances of getting re-elected.

There may be enough money available to maintain bridges and other infrastructure but that same money can have a bigger political pay-off if spent building something new instead of maintaining and repairing existing structures.

When money is spent building a new community center, a golf course, or anything that will be newsworthy, there will be ribbon-cutting ceremonies and the politicians who cut the ribbons can expect to see their pictures in the newspapers and on TV.

All that keeps their name before the public in a positive role and therefore enhances their prospects of being re-elected. But there are no ribbon-cutting ceremonies when bridges are being repaired or pot-holes are being filled in. These latter activities may be more valuable than a community center or a golf course, but they are not nearly as photogenic.

I've noticed the same incentives at work at UltraGlobalMegaCorp. If a new manager keeps an existing system working well, he will get no credit for it. He only gets rewarded for change. (via)

08/06/2007

Squandering Our Infrastructure Inheritance

An excerpt from Stephen Flynn:

The fact is that Americans have been squandering the infrastructure legacy bequeathed to us by earlier generations. Like the spoiled offspring of well-off parents, we behave as though we have no idea what is required to sustain the quality of our daily lives. Our electricity comes to us via a decades-old system of power generators, transformers and transmission lines—a system that has utility executives holding their collective breath on every hot day in July and August. We once had a transportation system that was the envy of the world. Now we are better known for our congested highways, second-rate ports, third-rate passenger trains and a primitive air traffic control system. Many of the great public works projects of the 20th century—dams and canal locks, bridges and tunnels, aquifers and aqueducts, and even the Eisenhower interstate highway system—are at or beyond their designed life span.

In the end, investigators may find that there are unique and extraordinary reasons why the I-35W bridge failed. But the graphic images of buckled pavement, stranded vehicles, twisted girders and heroic rescuers are a reminder that infrastructure cannot be taken for granted. The blind eye that taxpayers and our elected officials have been turning to the imperative of maintaining and upgrading the critical foundations that underpin our lives is irrational and reckless.

(via Cold Spring Shops)

08/04/2007

Yet Another Democrat Caught Cheating And Lying

The complete post from Carpe Diem:

The Missouri Civil Rights Initiative's (MoCRI) proposed language for its November 2008 ballot measure, which has been approved by the Missouri Secretary of State Robin Carnahan:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to prohibit any form of discrimination as an act of the state by declaring: The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting?

Language for the ballot measure, with changes, from Secretary of State Carnahan:

Shall the Missouri Constitution be amended to ban affirmative-action programs designed to eliminate discrimination against, and improve opportunities for, women and minorities in public contracting, employment, and education?

Hmmmmmmm.... that seems just a little bit different.....

As you might expect, the MoCRI filed a petition in the circuit court of Cole County legally challenging the changes in the ballot language.

Dangerous Ideas

Just a few of the many from Steven Pinker:

  • Do women, on average, have a different profile of aptitudes and emotions than men?
  • Has the state of the environment improved in the last 50 years?
  • Did Native Americans engage in genocide and despoil the landscape?
  • Is homosexuality the symptom of an infectious disease?
  • Would damage from terrorism be reduced if the police could torture suspects in special circumstances?
  • Would Africa have a better chance of rising out of poverty if it hosted more polluting industries or accepted Europe's nuclear waste?
  • Is the average intelligence of Western nations declining because duller people are having more children than smarter people?

08/03/2007

The Outrage Of The Day

From SFGate.com:

Disturbing decal: School official Cyndee Garcia shows off a sticker that will soon be placed in various locations in Orosi, Calif., in hope of dissuading mothers from abandoning their babies. Three newborns, all genetically linked to the same mother, have been left in the same neighborhood in the last few years. The most recent one, a girl, died.

The outrage is, of course, that the sticker Ms. Garcia is holding is in English only, which shows that Ms. Garcia and the school officials in Orosi think that only English-speaking mothers ever abandon their babies. Isn't this quite unfair to the Spanish-speaking Mom who's on the fence about dumping her newborn in the dumpster? Where's La Raza when you really need them?

07/31/2007

Because It Does Everything Else So Well

An excerpt from Don Salyards:

This week there were disclosures indicating that the federal government has done a lousy job of taking care of the medical and rehabilitation needs of our Veterans who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan. That’s an important and sad story, yet it is a subset of an even larger truth, that the Federal government of the United States doesn’t do anything very well or very efficiently.

Let’s look at several examples. How efficiently and effectively has the US Immigration and Naturalization Service processed the influx of immigrants into the United States? What has happened to airport traffic and passenger congestion over the past ten years under the Federal Aviation Administration? How effective was FEMA in handling the Katrina hurricane? How many thousands of people have died waiting for the US Food and Drug Administration to approve new drugs? How good is our boarder security? Do AMTRAK trains run on time? Have you tried to get a passport lately?

Given the fact that the Federal Government does such a miserable job of running everything they touch, how can anyone in this country possibly believe that we should have a single payer, nationalized health care system? Does anyone really want the Federal Government taking care of our health care needs? Can we be that stupid? According to many Democratic politicians, apparently we are.

07/28/2007

Bring Our Losers Home!

06/27/2007

Modern Ethics

An excerpt from Douglas Kern:

My highest law-school grade was in Legal Ethics. I achieved a stellar grade because I devised an infallible mechanism for solving any legal ethical dilemma. My mechanism was this: Remember that legal ethics is a system of rules:

1) designed by sociopaths;
2) for sociopaths;
3) to prevent public acknowledgment of their sociopathy;
4) while still allowing said sociopaths to fleece said public.

Once you realize that contemporary ethics is not morality but the clever simulation of morality, you’re halfway to qualifying for an ethics-consulting job.

Confessions of a Cheney Fan

An excerpt from (who else?) Jonah Goldberg:

Why do I like Dick Cheney? Because at a time when everybody talks a big game about how they don’t like people-pleasing politicians who live by the polls, Cheney is pretty much the only gu