The complete text of the 1875 book is online. Here's a short excerpt from Chapter 19:
The marriage of mother and daughter to one man was of so common an occurrence that it ceased to be regarded as anything out of the ordinary course of events.
I had some schoolmates, two sisters, whose mother was married to a Mr. McDonald, and when she gave herself to him, it was with the express understanding that the daughters should be sealed to him as soon as they were of a proper age. The little girls knew of the arrangement, and used to talk very openly of marrying Pa, and in very much the same way they would speak of their intention to take tea with a friend.
That mother must have taken a great deal of comfort with her children! Fancy her feelings; knowing that she was bringing up her daughters as wives for her own husband!
Wives and mothers, living outside of polygamy, can anything be more revolting to your ideas of womanly purity, more thoroughly opposed to all the sweet tenderness of the maternal instinct, than cases like this? And yet, horror- stricken as you are by them, they are by no means exceptional, but are of frequent occurrence. And it is in your own country that these outrages against all womanhood occur, under your own government, upheld by our own chosen legislators - tacitly, at least - since in this time, as in the days of Christ's actual presence on earth, those who are not for are against. And if your government and its rulers refuse to do, or even fail to do without refusing, anything to eradicate this foul blot upon national purity and honor, why, they are in so far encouraging its presence, and rendering it daily more difficult of eradication.
For the tide of evil that set so strongly in those terrible days of 1856 has never been stayed. It still rolls on with all the added ruth and abomination which it has gathered in its course, until it is one reeking mass of the foulest impurities.
Incest, murder, suicide, mania and bestiality are the chief "beauties " of this infamous system, which are so glowingly alluded to by its eloquent expounders and defenders.
Gotta love those long 19th-Century book titles, eh? I first discovered this book 17 years ago at, of all places, a funeral home. I was browsing the old leather-bound books on the bookshelf, waiting for the service to begin, and found books like "Speeches of Theodore Roosevelt" and "Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin" and "The Federalist Papers" when all of a sudden my eye caught a glimpse of "Wife No. 19, A Life in Bondage". Whenever I go to a funeral service at that funeral home, I pull out that book and read a couple of pages.
In other words: I think X. Those who don't think X have a problem with Y. If you consider responding to my assertion that those who don't think X have a problem with Y, then you've proved my point and most certainly have a problem with Y. If you think X also, then you're okay so give yourself a pat on the back. ...
This post does make me wonder what it means to be open-minded. It seems a lot of the people who want others to be open-minded get awfully upset about others not being open-minded. Which in itself doesn't seem very open-minded.
I wonder what the world is coming to when it seems we are all free to discuss the merits of a view but not allowed to hold one.